July 15, 2000 issue. This file presents an archive copy of the issue of the FYI France ejournal, ISSN 1071-5916, which was distributed via email on July 15, 2000.
Versions of the following have appeared online regularly, since 1992, as a feature of the FYI France ejournal, ISSN 1071-5916, which is distributed for free via email every month except August. Ejournal subscriptions may be obtained via email request to: kessler@well.sf.ca.us
Here this file is one of a number made available -- hopefully
attractively, all in one place, and relevant to libraries and online
digital information work in France and Europe -- as part of FYI France
(sm)(tm), an online service to which anyone can subscribe for 12
months by postal mailing a check for US $45, payable to Jack Kessler, to
PO Box 460668, San Francisco, California, USA 94146 (site licenses also
are available): please write your email address on the front of your
check. Please email suggestions for improvements to me at kessler@well.sf.ca.us
--oOo--
Lyon, le 26 juin, sitting on a bench in the "rue de la Ré"
The marriage of the Internet with the French economy is not one of those self - evident things. No less than Amazon.com apparently is announcing its entry into the French book market this Fall: or at least "the world's biggest bookstore" is being announced as a French market entrant -- by the new Wired / Business 2.0 / Time Digital French glossy, Newbiz Magazine (recommended reading -- details at http://www.newbiz.fr).
But I can just hear the denials, delays, qualifiers which will be forthcoming. For just as "how can one speak of governing in a land which has 265 varieties of cheese?", so also, how can one speak of ebusiness in a land which boasts, among other complications, one of the lowest household computer penetration rates in Western Europe, plus one single, monolithic, hierarchical and centralized and bureaucratic and still government - owned telephone company?
"The business of America is business", Calvin Coolidge famously observed -- Dorothy Parker summed up the French attitude on this sort of social vision when she asked, on learning of Coolidge's death, "How could they tell?"
The French live for so much more than just business -- "e" or other. These people have had revolutions, and they have waged both love and war, and they have slaughtered each other regularly -- I am in Lyon -- and they have done these and so many other passionately irrational things, throughout their long and terrible history, nearly all for nearly any notion other than economic gain.
Even the parts of the 19th century and bits of the 20th century which have tried to see everything in money and materialistic terms have been forced, ultimately, to recognize this French exception. French motivations have included religion, and social status, and nationalism, and simple anger and frustration and arrogance -- still the land of the "crime passionel" -- at least as much as they have the colder calculations of "business".
Indeed, among Europeans, the French never have been all that good at "business" per se. The classic analysis of the economic revolutions of the 18th century by Paul Mantoux notes, "So great was the superiority of English production that neighbouring countries could hardly have kept out English goods save by a policy of strict prohibition..." (1).
And much in 19th century economic and political policy focussed upon France's "retard" in the industrial sphere: she became nearly the last great land of Europe left with not only little industry, but with an agricultural base centered around an archaic system of petits rentiers and little independent family farms -- less evocative of any nascent modern agribusiness than of the manorial system of the Middle Ages. The Unbound Prometheus of the Industrial Revolution had a very slow start in France.
Again, now, France is lagging, and she rapidly is falling even further behind her British and Irish and Scandinavian and German and in some respects even her Italian and Spanish neighbors, in the latest "digital" economic revolution:
| name | hosts | population | pop./ |
| (1999) | hosts | ||
| .fi/Finland | 631,248 | 5,158,372 | 8 |
| .is/Iceland | 29,598 | 272,512 | 9 |
| .no/Norway | 401,889 | 4,438,547 | 11 |
| .se/Sweden | 594,627 | 8,911,296 | 15 |
| .dk/Denmark | 336,928 | 5,356,845 | 16 |
| .nl/Netherlands | 824,990 | 15,807,641 | 19 |
| .ch/Switzerland | 306,073 | 7,275,467 | 24 |
| .uk/United Kingdom | 1,901,812 | 59,113,439 | 31 |
| .be/Belgium | 320,840 | 10,182,034 | 32 |
| .de/Germany | 1,702,486 | 82,087,361 | 48 |
| .ie/Ireland | 59,681 | 3,632,944 | 61 |
| .fr/France | 779,879 | 58,978,172 | 76 |
| .it/Italy | 658,307 | 56,735,130 | 86 |
| .cz/Czech Republic | 112,748 | 10,280,513 | 91 |
| .es/Spain | 415,641 | 39,167,744 | 94 |
(Network Wizards, http://www.nw.com &
http://www.isc.org/ds/WWW-200001/dist-byname.html; and
http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/)
(Methodological ps: ...an "Internet metric", only an "Internet metric, and as such subject to all of the caveats associated with same, i.e. "hosts" has to be defined carefully, and "population", and "population per host" increasingly mean little, as Internet access changes and as per capita income becomes a more important factor -- but the metric still is interesting, at least for comparing France to other countries very much like it...)
Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie has observed, "We French have been called dinosaurs... but the dinosaur is a very sympathetic animal, and at least now we will become electronic dinosaurs." (2) There is some merit in the French economic "retard" this time around, perhaps -- at least insofar as France can continue to enjoy the strong family life, solid educational structure, and general sense of security in society which always have been so valued.
All of these at times seem to be disappearing in the US and elsewhere, as people surrender too quickly and too completely to the Digital Revolution. So just perhaps, runs the hope of some, France will be able to contribute a more "mature" attitude toward the implementation of these exciting new technologies, once they finally reach l'Hexagone in full force.
But certain French friends of mine are tremendously concerned with the job insecurity, family disruption, and social bifurcation which the Digital Revolution has brought to the US and Britain, and which they say now, already, it is bringing to France: all that rapid job turnover, long and irregular commutes and working hours, splits between "haves" and "have - nots" in both information and other things...
There is debate everywhere about the origins of all of these changes. Some have said that the Digital Revolution is not to blame, or at least that it promises still more that is positive -- that a digital "global village" will so benefit from the freedoms of telecommuting and telework and worker productivity brought by the new techniques that more time and energy, not less, will become available for "personal time", and for relaxed "quality time" spent with family, and so on.
Others have demonized the digital world, characterizing the escapism and forced rationality of "The Matrix" as components of the futuristic Hell to which we all are headed, given the varieties of weirdness in our current society. See the many -- too many -- inconclusive social and psychological studies devoted to the impact of the digital phenomenon, plus the insightful nightmares of science fiction writers like William Gibson.
But there is no debate about the existence of the current pressures. White collar and mid - life unemployment, increasing family and youth problems, and commuting nightmares all -- already -- are integral parts of the Digital Revolution experience, whether that experience is headed, ultimately, towards the "global village" heaven of which some dream, or to the violent and drug - crazed Armageddon which others imagine. In France, Jean - Luc Godard was worrying about all of this 'way back in the 1960s -- well before the Digital Revolution -- but the spectre is raising its ugly head again now.
To many of the French, still, the ideal is a picnic -- in the country, with the kids -- or, perhaps even better, a long outdoor lunch around a giant table surrounded by extended family at grandmère's maison in the country... or that 1-2 month vacation off camping somewhere... These still are the sources of so much in French "congeniality" -- or at least of the remnant idealization of it, in the minds of Paris pe'riphe'rique drivers stuck in their 2 - hour - door - to - door daily commutes -- so much so that removal of the ideal would destroy whatever remains of that "congeniality".
But all of this appears to be gravely threatened, now, by the speed and pressures promised by, or at least associated with, the Digital Revolution: the traffic gridlock and personal pressure promised / threatened by the experience of the San Francisco Bay Area, or of Fairfax County Virginia, do not translate well to the French experience.
No American has so much cultural value vested in the ideal of the time for contemplation, and non - business concerns, of that relaxed and lazy extended afternoon "déjeuner sur l'herbe", as do the French. Take away that advantage of the "French exception" and all that may be left will be the "retard" -- that lag...
--oOo--
One friend in France reminds me, "We are Latins..."
And so France is: more the South than the North, but also more the entire country than the Northern European and particularly British traditions which most here associate with the USA, and especially with USA attitudes toward "business".
The famous book title was "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism"... France is a Catholic country. The "Protestant Ethic", toward work or anything else, is hard to find here. In fact much French blood has been sacrificed, throughout their long history, to get it out and keep it out. "The Spirit of Capitalism", in France, is more a rare and odd commodity than it is the driving social force which perhaps underlies what Northern European nations and the USA have been accomplishing in their recent Digital Revolution.
This "Latin" phenomenon is even personal. The role of the male breadwinner in a Latin culture perhaps makes the high job turnover so characteristic of "hi - tech" and "the digital economy" that much harder to take for the French.
A middle - aged American male who loses his job has "Horatio Alger self - improvement" and British "stiff upper lip" traditions to fall back upon, at least. But in France it is very hard for a middle - aged chômeur to look his mates in the eye -- and particularly if he is wealthy and well - educated, as so many of the hitech - induced white collar unemployed are everywhere now -- and in the French "Latin" male example the shame hurts him with his wife, and his children, and around that extended family lunch table where all things must come out into the open.
Never mind that if he works at it he will find another boulot within 6 months -- of course he will lose that too within the next two years, by the hitech job insecurity rules -- but it is the present reality of unemployment which hurts the "Latin" mentality so much...
--oOo--
The lead article in the aforementioned July - August Newbiz Magazine -- http://www.newbiz.fr -- is, "Les cadres secoués par internet": photo of a wonderfully French altho' very un - ENArque - looking "eager beaver" middle level manager, poised to take the plunge into the new digital economy with all the gusto and panache of a latter - day Cyrano -- Depardieu - style (the candidate is a little overweight) -- against the background of a lengthy series of sondages / opinion polls in which the magazine has poked at current French managers about their Internet usage -- they don't use it, much, certainly not when compared to burgeoning B2C and B2B activities elsewhere...
The French "cadre" in the photo -- in his Armani shoes, and fancy suit, and short - cropped but elegantly - styled hairdo, and necktie and white - shirt - most - likely - sporting - elegant - cufflinks, and leather attache case -- looks very much like the archetypal middle level manager whom elsewhere the Internet and general "downsizing / pyramid flattening" already has blown away, in the US and UK and most other places which "get it"... I guess the French don't, yet... clueless... altho I still think / hope that may be a good thing... "sympathetic electronic dinosaurs"...
The Newbiz Magazine editor, Eric Meyer, writes a wonderfully - funny endpaper in the current issue: "To 'e' or not to be?" --
"Prenez, par exemple, un PDG comme Francis Mer, d'Usinor... comment mettre sa boîte à l'heure d'internet?... annoncer qu'Usinor allait, comme les start - up, faire quelques années de pertes, mais ses prédécesseurs ont, malheureusement, déjà fait le coup plusieurs fois..."
"Qu'inventer pour fabriquer de l'Usinor.com? Vendre des rouleaux de métal aux enchères sur iBazar? Placer une webcam à la cantine?..."
"Coller un <
And the French, once again (this has happened to them before, in times
of stress), are not getting married, and are having fewer and fewer
babies -- youth unemployment has been in the double digits for a long time
now, and a major national problem even worse than the general
"chômage" -- these are the kids who should have been launching the
French Digital Revolution!
But it is hard to form a household if you have no job, and if you are
older it is still harder to look the spouse in the eye when you are on the
dole... that Latin pride... neither "Horatio Alger" nor "the Protestant
Ethic" nor a lot of other culturally - bound things play well in France...
--oOo--
So I wonder how and whether the ebusiness digital economy, with all of
the fundamental social changes which it already is bringing -- to the US
and other places where it is more active -- is going to fare in France?
People here tell me, still, that they "cannot make the email work"
because "all of the manuals are written in English". How long is it going
to take before the Internet "speaks" -- really -- the "language of
the customer"?! This involves so much more than just the matters of
incompatible keyboard layouts, and character sets, and ISO norms, all of
which no doubt underly the immediate problem in many cases.
US system designers and programmers have to begin on an understanding
of the overall psychology of the "foreign" customer -- "whole marketing",
to some -- if the Internet ever is to scale up to international
applications well. Easily said / not so easily done...
It involves so much more than the fumbling translation into the local
argot of a few pull - down "help" screens. There are perceptual
differences, and cultural and political and religious and several other,
to be considered -- all very much in addition to more obvious bottom -
line linguistic necessities, such as providing adequate language
translations.
In the French case, for example, the inclusion of advertising by the
McDonald's chain for the moment would cause a problem, as could anything
particularly insensitive done by either Microsoft Corp. or Walt Disney:
Microsoft, and particularly Bill Gates personally, have been demonized
by the recent Paris press. And although advertising might capitalize on
the undeniably intense public fascination with both, this must be done
very carefully, with excruciatingly - close attention to local
sensitivities.
The same goes for Disney, which through the ups and downs of its Paris
EuroDisney theme park -- now called officially "Disneyland Paris", so I
guess there are other European Disneylands in the works now -- has
established itself firmly as the leading local "globalization" demon, for
the moment. Any Hollywood media maven who thinks that the current
popularity of "Disneyland Paris" indicates that the Paris mob never will
change, does not know French history...
And then of course they are blowing up McDonald's restaurants over
here: with dynamite -- not just figuratively. The guy leading the charge,
if he doesn't become the next President of France, at least has become the
folk - hero of many of the French for his efforts.
So keep the "Big Mac" and particularly the "Ronald McDonald" ads off of
the Websites for a while, folks -- better Marianne and the tricolor and
perhaps some camembert -- unless you want to evoke feelings and customer
reactions far more complex than any which your advertising department back
in Muskokee has in mind.
--oOo--
There is more -- more than just the obvious "read the local papers"
consideration, that is -- again using the French example of a more general
"Internet scaling" problem. French attitudes on "pornography" and
"informal chat" -- both of these so terribly important, the one negatively
and the other more positively, to the US American Internet -- require some
re - thinking.
In France, naked human bodies -- of men, women, even of children -- are
not considered pornographic. The artist Balthus is popular over here -- as
is Nabokov's novel "Lolita" -- and Woody Allen's marital antics are
tolerated as the "wanderings of genius", and streetcar ads feature plenty
of female and male breasts, nipple details and all.
But in France Nazis are pornographic. The swastika evokes the
same feelings of irrational revulsion, in many of the French, which a
poster of a naked child, or a photo of couples coupling, or lewd movie -
star - and - politican stories evoke in the US Bible Belt: not different
reactions, but the same -- an American seeking to understand this should
think of her / his own revulsion at seeing a typical Calvin Klein ad --
that is at least the same revulsion felt by the French at seeing
Nazi memorabilia on a Website.
So, when a French judge hit international headlines recently by
condemning -- and restricting -- Yahoo! from providing Nazi memorabilia
sales on its online auction site, the French simply were reacting as the
Americans do to porn: nothing "holier than thou art" in either reaction --
these are just differing cultural values in conflict, neither being more
right or more wrong than the other.
(see http://www.afa-france.com/html/action/23052000.html)
This French preoccupation with Nazis is an example -- a good one, to US
system designers trying to teach their new Internet to deal with the
foreign and particularly its non - English - speaking world -- but only
one example:
In Thailand, for instance, they value democracy and freedom of
expression as much as Americans do -- and as the French do -- but the
Thais just value the sanctity of their Royal Family more. So, recently,
when the Thais suggested that online criticism of their Royal Family be
restricted, and the Internet Society objected on "free expression"
grounds, the situation was the same as that faced now by the French with
their objections to Nazi memorabilia: the "language" spoken can be similar
-- or nearly, with more adequate translations of the user manuals -- but
the parties still can be far apart, on culture, politics, perceptions.
--oOo--
The question for the Internet is how far will it go to meet the
mentality of its customer? In "Globalization", nowadays, so much is being
presented in the guise of "universal human values" which is seen by
foreighners -- by the French, by the Thais -- as being an imposition of
"Americanization"...
"Democracy Conference Disavowal: French Foreign Policy Steers Its Own
Course: Warsaw Declaration on Democracy Rejected: 100 Nations Bullied By
US" (Int. Herald - Tribune, June 28, p. 1) H. Vedrine interviewed:
"...misguided to believe that democracy could be imposed on countries...
Democracy was most often a slow - growing process that grew from within a
country"...
Even some US "special relationship" English friends view current US
"Globalization" attitudes as representing, at their very best, simple -
minded "Americanization". (3)
Americans should consider how we ourselves would feel had the Internet
been invented in Thailand and exported to the US: with user manuals
written only in Thai, and with restrictions built in against criticizing
the personal lives of the Thai Royal Family -- and by automatic and blind
extension, perhaps, any First Family, including our own?
Or what if the Internet at its origins had been French, and had arrived
in the US with AZERTY keyboard layouts, and a confusion of diacriticals,
and plenty of hidden restrictions on access to political extremism and
Nazi memorabilia?
Turn the tables... see it from the customer's point of view... old
marketing advice...
Conflicting values can be ranked, tradeoffs made -- multicultural
efforts can be and have to be flexible. Amartya Sen makes yet another of
his periodic wry and eloquent pleas for this in the latest NY Review of
Books (July 20, p.35):
"It has been claimed that many non - Western societies have values that
place little emphasis on liberty or tolerance... Values such as tolerance,
liberty, and reciprocal respect have been described as 'culture -
specific'..." Sen then gives examples from 3rd c. BC and 16th c. AD Indian
culture, and suggests, "Once we recognize that many ideas that are taken
to be quintessentially Western have also flourished in other
civilizations, we also see that these ideas are not as culture - specific
as is sometimes claimed..."
So we in the US may recognize, some day, that the Thais value
"democracy" as much as we do, even if things are a little different there.
Closer to home, we in the US may recognize that French "democracy" and
other beliefs, and our own, still have much in common -- enough at least
for a good working basis on things like Internet development -- even if
they do deal with Nazis a little differently than we do, over there in
France.
In the meantime, let's back off a bit: the French -- and the Thais and
the Chinese and the Indians and plenty of others -- all love "democracy"
and "freedom of expression" just as much as we in the US do. But if they
happen to cherish, or fear, a few of their own local values like Royal
Family veneration or political memories more, can't room be made for that?
"Globalization" does not have to be "Americanization" -- not yet -- not
until "Empire" (4), and / or not until the decision that
the whole world in fact has become the same has been made, hopefully by
all of us.
Have a nice summer. Stay offline -- read a book -- a novel. And try to
avoid France in football (the round kind) season... noisy...
Footnotes:
--oOo--
--hjlm--
or you can link / jump over to:
FYI France (sm)(tm) e-journal ISSN 1071 - 5916
*
| FYI France (sm)(tm) is a monthly electronic
| journal published since 1992 as a small-scale,
| personal experiment, in the creation of large-
| scale "information overload", by Jack Kessler.
/ \ Any material written by me which appears in
----- FYI France may be copied and used by anyone for
// \\ any good purpose, so long as, a) they give me
--------- credit and show my email address, and, b) it
// \\ isn't going to make them money: if it is going
to make them money, they must get my permission
in advance, and share some of the money which they get with me.
Use of material written by others requires their permission.
FYI France archives may be found at http://infolib.berkeley.edu
(search fyifrance), or http://www.cru.fr/listes/biblio-fr@cru.fr/
(BIBLIO-FR archive), or http://listserv.uh.edu/archives/pacs-l.html
(PACS-L archive) or http://www.fyifrance.com . Suggestions,
reactions, criticisms, praise, and poison-pen letters all will be
gratefully received at kessler@well.sf.ca.us .
Copyright 1992- , by Jack Kessler,
all rights reserved except as expressed above.
Return to the top of this page .
Copyright © 1992- by Jack Kessler, all rights reserved.
W3 site maintained at http://www.fyifrance.com
Document maintained by: Jack Kessler, kessler@well.sf.ca.us
Last update: July 18, 2000